23 Responses to “Happy Ballentine’s Day from Daddy Justice: Ben Vonderheide Exposes Corruption of District Justice Kelly S. Ballentine that Results in 9 Felony Counts”

Comments

Read below or add a comment...

  1. Mr. E

    I’m having a hard time coming up with words to express my reaction to Judge Ballentine’s behavior. It’s like bad television.

    Good job, Mr. Vonderheide.

    • Dr Tara J. Palmatier

      I know. I think we have a new TV program to replace Cops; Judges.

      Bad judge, bad judge
      Whatcha gonna do?
      Whatcha gonna do when they come for you?

      • Dr. F

        “Bad judge, bad judge…” Oh my lordy Dr. T. I can’t believe I’m saying this, but that was pretty funny.

        Aren’t we a gleeful thing today hhhmmm?

        Well that’s just fine with me because it’s put a bounce in my step this morning too.

        Thanks for telling about this on your site and I tell you, I was wondering what had happened with this woman. I knew it was around about now that she was being ‘processed’ by the same system she was bilking for fun and profit.

        Hey, who’d have thunk that the muck and mire of this toad of a woman was running in rivulets all along. It’s interesting to know that her darker forays into unethical tinkering have been unearthed at the last minute.

        Seriously, did I miss something about these other activities already written about in the MSM ?

        I can have a look later to answer that question I guess, but for today forget it mate, I’m just going to enjoy the party.

        • Dr Tara J. Palmatier

          You’re very kind, Dr F. It’s corny at best :)

          Daddy Justice sent the link this morning and all I did was tell his story. Glad it help to put a spring in your step.

  2. david

    “Happy Ballentine’s Day” BWAHAHAWWA…you’re killin’ me..stop it!

    Seriously, this is unbelievable….there is justice.

    • Dr Tara J. Palmatier

      Happy Ballentine’s is all Daddy Justice.

      Justice hasn’t been served yet. She still has her judge position and is on PAID leave. Tax payers are paying for this criminal.

  3. Micksbabe

    She sounds KLASSY.

    • Dr Tara J. Palmatier

      Actually, she sounds incredibly narcissistic. Especially in regard to what seems like her belief that the laws are for everyone else and she is exempt.

      • B Experienced

        I think it merged into psychopathic behavior. The blatant and obviously glaring lie that can be very easily checked such as writing off her own tickets is my red flag.

        I truly believe that if there ever was a search for Cluster B’s in the fields of Law, Medicine, Psychology and Psychiatry, Religion and Finance there wouldn’t be many left if the B’s were weeded out of their jobs based on those grounds. The power, control and admiration that these fields hold is simply too irresistible for them to pass up.

        I think it is the foremost reason why their peers do not report them as they ethically and oftentimes legally should. They know what they are up against.

  4. B Experienced

    My favorite part is when her delusional omnipotence is broken when she says that it isn’t supposed to happen this way. In order words, I am GOD, and I control all of my OWN reality thank you so this can’t be happening. Isn’t the role of being a Judge a substitute for being God. Bahhh. Damn fool!

    • Dr Tara J. Palmatier

      I caught that, too, BE. Frightening.

    • Mellaril

      “Isn’t the role of being a Judge a substitute for being God.”

      That’s the whole context of original sin, we decide what’s good and evil.

    • Ken

      ACTUALLY, members of the judiciary DO share perks such as exemption from the usual parking, and other, tickets.

      Normally police do not give other police (off duty, from another jurisdiction, etc.) tickets for minor offenses as a professional courtesy; when they encounter judges, etc. they tend do the same. If you doubt this, consider those black with horizontal blue stripe stickers readily observable on many cars on the road — those are, or were originally, ONLY sold to law enforcement personnel (now one can order them on Amazon). It helps/ed them identify each other & extend the courtesy/perk (at least it used to before becoming so common). There are other color patterns available for other related professions–and those are still sold only to people with verified professional backgrounds. But, to emphasize, that’s been the informal policy for minor infractions — same where the average citizen might just get a warning too because they were polite, etc. when confronted when the officer was “on the fence” about writing a ticket. So I’ve heard from several police…who also tend to be somewhat more unforgiving for more substantial offenses by another police officer.

      When Ballentine remarks ‘it isn’t supposed to be this way’ she’s probably thinking along the above lines, which are undoubtedly very commonplace. Recall the House Banking Scandal of 1992 where they were essentially given interest free loans via a perk that covered all checks written regardless of actual funds in the savings account? This sort of thing is VERY COMMON among members of any particular group. At least until made a public scandal.

      What’s interesting is, in Ballentine’s situation, she was getting repeat tickets by police that undoubtedly knew who the car belonged to and those were given for minor offenses (parking). THAT indicates that even local police (at least one officer) was probably fed up with something or other with her…which is indicative that the charges she’s facing may very well be trivial relative to other more substantial matters yet unknown to the public …. that is, those charges are likely analogous to Al Capone getting convicted for tax evasion rather than murder, etc. Just watch & wait; if she’s convicted chances are good some really nasty skeletons will come crashing out of her closet such that the bit about the tickets will be quickly forgotten (i.e. it wouldn’t surprise me that the bit with the drug-dealing boyfriend would lead to revelations about being a mastermind in a major drug distribution network…).

  5. Mellaril

    Another scary thing is she was ELECTED as a judge. If she isn’t convicted which might preclude her from being a judge and nobody runs against her, she’ll get elected again.

    • Dr Tara J. Palmatier

      That is scary, Mellaril. As one of the gentlemen over at AVfM pointed out, Judge Ballentine has double immunity. She’s a member of a minority group and she’s a woman – btw, this is not a sexist or racist statement it’s true – she’s a double sacred cow. But then, doesn’t sacred cow make for the best hamburgers?

      If Pennsylvania doesn’t do the right thing, hopefully, the voting constituency will.

  6. ron7127

    No surprise. I know of two, fairly promiscous women judge here in Minneapolis, who have bothe cheated on their spouse with married men, and who, routinely rake guys over the coals in a blatantly sexist fashion in both sentencing and when a guy applies for a TRO due to his female partner’s violence.
    I don’t think the general public understands that the folks sitting on the bench were, often, not the brightest in their law school classes , nor are they, in many cases, very morally upright. Many have good hair, or have political connections that got them on the bench.
    Being a Judge is a very easy, low stress job, as compared to actually preparing and trying cases.
    Many lawyers ae attracted to it because the pay is decent, the work load is easy, and there is a ton of time off, as well as perks,
    These folks, the judges, are, seldom all that bright and are often just a-holes that just got by in law school.

    • Dr Tara J. Palmatier

      Thanks for the insights, ron7127. Frighteningly, that explains a lot.

      • ron7127

        Yes, Tara, it seems that a high% of folks simply accept that the members of the judiciary are bright and moral. But, if you really look and listen to them you find that they are neither, in many cases.
        Seems we need to imbue these figureheads with all types of talent and virtue, so that we feel safer.
        Our legal system is rife with incompetence and corruption. Juries and Judges get things wrong a lot. This is why favoring the death penalty seems insane to me.One can only imagine the thousands of folks wrongly executed over the centuries.
        This judge, Ballantine, reminds me of a lot of the judges I have seen appointed-incompetnt and corrupt. I wonder where she ranked in her law school class.

Leave A Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.