Covert Abuse: Watch Out for the Quiet Ones, Part One
The following article is written by another CrazyBuster, SSG. SSG and her husband have found ways to manage his high-conflict ex who is more subtle in her emotional terrorism. She’s more of a “quiet one” or covert abuser.
Next week, I’ll post Covert Abuse: Watch Out for the Quiet Ones, Part Two. The second post will offer specific suggestions for managing this type of high-conflict ex:
When most people think of a high-conflict ex, they probably envision the shoe-throwing, door-slamming, tire-slashing, cheek-slapping, tire-screeching and/or threat-screaming archetype. Unfortunately, this is often the case. Overt abuse is generally easy to identify.
Covert abuse, like passive-aggressive behavior, is often tougher to identify, but can be just as damaging, if not more so than overt abuse. Covert abuse, in my experience, can cause a person to doubt themselves and question their own sanity.
My husband’s ex-wife is one of the “quiet ones” or covert abusers. Although she wasn’t a rager or door slammer, the pain caused to my husband and the harm done to his relationships with his children was undoubtedly no less than that caused by the more overtly loud or violent types. His situation didn’t include holes in walls, deflated car tires or bruised skin, but that doesn’t mean he hasn’t suffered real and lasting damage.
My husband’s former wife had an affair, threw him out, moved the kids out-of-state with the new man (who soon cheated on her and left), lied to the children about what happened (rewrote history), held my husband’s access to his children over his head as a control mechanism and then, finally, punished him in the worst way she could (convincing the children to stop contact) for putting his life back together, moving on and remarrying.
My husband’s ex-wife isn’t a yeller. She’s small with a high-pitched voice and a demeanor that seems to squeak, “Am I okay?” But I have heard her teeth-clenched voice over the phone as she strains to keep her rage from simmering over. Her emails hold more venom than the worst curse words. Although, aside from the sheer frequency of them, they’re nothing you would show to anyone in authority to prove anything.
I mean, what’s wrong with e-mailing a Bible quote or 50 to people who never answer your e-mails? Isn’t it normal for divorced parents to communicate “about the children” or “for the children” on a regular basis even though none of the communication mentions the kids anymore? What’s wrong with leaving innocent voice messages when you have been asked repeatedly to stop?
Even when my husband’s ex was on her “best” behavior (prior to meeting me), she was setting the stage for full-blown parental alienation. She withheld critical information about their children from him and wove a cocoon around her and the kids that was solidified by the information she withheld from him.
She didn’t consult him about things like cars, braces, unchaperoned spring breaks and travel. While she kept secrets, my husband was allowed to have no privacy nor personal life after their divorce. One time she even tracked him down at the hotel where he was vacationing with a girlfriend for a weekend get-away. She did this, of course, “for the kids.”
Although my husband’s ex-wife did not respect him and encouraged their children to follow her lead, she still tried to prohibit him from moving on with his life. My husband’s ex began acting out as soon as she learned we were dating in a seemingly desperate struggle to not feel abandoned by the man she threw away. Because, you see, for some high-conflict individuals, people take on more value when someone else wants them or when they don’t need you anymore.
The first acting out episode was quite dramatic and channeled through their youngest child a.k.a. the ex’s best weapon. My husband’s ex had their youngest child make a screaming, crying phone call to him and accused him of not loving her anymore because he had a girlfriend.
After my husband and I became serious, his ex-wife’s transparent cries for attention and control ensued. For example, the predictable, manufactured, exaggerated or totally fabricated holiday or Friday evening crises. She refused to split visitation travel expenses evenly with my husband anymore. The kids’ summer and spring break visits to my husband’s home came to a screeching halt. If he wanted to see his children, he had to be the one to travel there.
Knowing she had full psychological control of the children, he went along with the game. I rolled my eyes. And we went on with our lives.
I figured her immaturity, which is what I thought it was at that time, would continue. But my husband and I had no idea what we were in for after we married. For the next two years, we experienced severe, constant harassment dressed up as normal communication. Five months into our marriage, the kids stopped talking to their father with no explanation.
The deafening silence was intermittently interrupted by wild, revisionist accusations the kids were fed by their mother. Meanwhile, my husband’s ex would call him attempting to rehash their marriage and divorce and swear to him, ten years later, that she really hadn’t cheated.
The first year of our marriage, the assault from “the quiet one” was particularly savage.
I witnessed my husband experience shock, then extreme confusion, self-doubt, upset, anger, torment and months of despair. Toward the end of our first year together, we went to a psychologist for help. There, we were given the tools to handle someone the doctor described as having borderline personality disorder (BPD).
Mainly, we learned to set boundaries. At the advice of both the doctor and the Crazybusters, we stopped allowing the ex to have private communication with my husband. This is very important. Abusers like my husband’s ex count on being able to isolate their targets. She knew she could get away with manipulating my husband or engaging him in anger one-on-one.
Private, one-on-one communication with an abusive, high-conflict ex is like a “warm bath” for them.
My husband stopped taking her calls and we set up a joint email account for her to relay information about the kids. We told her we didn’t want to hear from her unless there was an emergency. Basically, we stopped rewarding her bad behavior (withholding the kids) and let her know her intrusion into our lives was not welcome.
Just as many crazy, abusive, high-conflict BPDs are want to do, my husband’s ex viewed our new boundaries as a challenge. She persevered in her mission to keep my husband from moving on with his life, to keep the focus on herself and to maintain control. Again, she used a variety of predictable and obvious tactics to try to keep my husband engaged with her.
She sent medical co-pay invoices knowing full well that my husband, who pays the kids’ medical insurance, was not responsible for them. She called our home phone and left messages asking us to send information she already had — like our mailing address to which she was mailing the co-pay invoices! She called at all hours hoping my husband would answer, which he never did. Subsequently, she left follow-up messages saying she was going to get an attorney because we wouldn’t take her calls or respond to her transparent ploys for attention.
Then the incessant e-mailing began. The messages very rarely had anything to do with the kids. They arrived in rapid succession and were rife with meaningless content for the sole purpose of seeking my husband’s attention. Although, she did send us photos of the kids – with herself in the pictures!
The barrage of unwanted communication from my husband’s ex continued — even though the kids refused to return his calls. But, by sticking to our rock solid boundaries – and it required effort from both of us – we weathered the storm.
Eventually, the children reconnected with their father as they grew older. Albeit, the relationships are fragile. My husband accepts that this might be as good as it gets due to the fact that the children lived under the influence of his ex, whom we liken to a cult leader, for over 10 years.
After 5 years of game-playing, my husband’s ex finally got that we weren’t going to go along with her crazy game-plan. While she still makes some communication attempts, like toxic fumes seeking cracks in a wall, she’s no longer a force in our lives. Our marriage is good and we are strong.
Thanks, SSG, for your first stellar contribution to Shrink4Men! Be sure to check back next week for Part Two.
Shrink4Men Coaching and Consulting Services:
Dr Tara J. Palmatier provides confidential, fee-for-service, consultation/coaching services to help both men and women work through their relationship issues via telephone and/or Skype chat. Her practice combines practical advice, support, reality testing and goal-oriented outcomes. Please visit the Shrink4Men Services page for professional inquiries.
55 Responses to “Covert Abuse: Watch Out for the Quiet Ones, Part One”
Comments
Read below or add a comment...
Follow Shrink4men
Where in the World
Subscribe to Comments
Affiliate
Wow, that brought back some memories — many of them current. Especially the part about the HCP seeing boundaries as challenges. My husband’s HCP ex-wife is like that blonde, red leather body suit-wearing android on Terminator 3. SHE REFUSES TO DIE! Regardless of how many semis run over her.
My husband and I are counting down the months when until his kids are no longer under his ex’s “ownership” and he will then too, by proxy, be free. Free at last!
Micksbabe, I used to refer to her as the Satanic Energizer Bunny. She kept going and going and going. It is exhausting to be on this end of it, and I was absolutely floored by her lack of shame/pride. But, like you indicate, when the kids get older, things change.
As I look back at past abusive relationships, I can’t help but kick myself for being naive. While I used to be involved with physically abusive women, I also used to be involved with women who tried to destroy my with psychological abuse. The cold and calculating nature of the women I used to date changed my view on relationships forever. My past relationships were so abusive that I refuse to date for a long time. I don’t want to be used again to try an make an ex-boyfriend jealous or to be the re-bound guy. I don’t want to fall victim to women whose love is determined by what I can give them with regard to money. I don’t want to get involved with women who feel it is empowering to hurt me just so they can get an ego boost. I don’t want to get hurt by women while in a relationship and have people tell me that it was my fault for being abused.
I know there are wonderful women available, but I am way too paranoid to be in another relationship anytime soon. A relationship isn’t worth having if I have to constantly question a woman’s motives.
Excellent advice. Another alternative I’ve seen work well is to use a third party to filter the email-only communications. For example, a family member that will pass along the messages that actually DO contain information or a question about the kids — and delete the rest.
Great article SSG. I’m happy things worked out well for you
Thank you. And what a great idea to have a third party filter e-mail! Doing that would have saved lots of steam coming out of my ears all those months!
There are third party companies who specialize in this sort of thing. I believe one was mentioned here on Shrink4Men, but I can’t find it. One thing these services do is track ALL communication, which is very useful for legal purposes, if it comes to that.
Yep, it’s ‘OurFamilyWizard (OFW) program’ mentioned in Dr. T’s articles on April 8, 2011 and April 13, 2011.
Yes, I’ve heard of FamilyWizard. Even with us telling the ex she was to use a joint e-mail account, she immediately (in usual manipulative fashion) e-mailed the kids (and cc’ed) us telling them they were to only contact us in this way, too. I quickly responded individually to the kids, reassuring them that they could use ANY mode of communication — any e-mail addresses or phone numbers. I can’t imagine how she would have twisted around using FamilyWizard.
My ex-wife was indeed the “quiet one” in public but was quite another person behind closed doors: friends would comment on what a sweet wife she was and how lucky I was — one friend of mine even went so far as to say that she could never picture us fighting!
Well the damaged walls, destroyed personal items, dented floors, kicked-in doors, not to mention the multiple scars on my arms, hands and leg, speak of another person than what she portrayed in public life. Although snippets of her true personality would sometimes escape during family events when she knew she could embarrass me the most.
I guess the old advice rings true in this case: you gotta watch out for the quiet ones!
Ugh. Yes, nightmares. Why can we not get AWAY from these people?!
Why can’t the courts see these people for who they are and actually hold them accountable for their actions?
Great question. How do you control crazy? Jail? I don’t have a problem with that, but it would require a huge (and long overdue) paradigm shift for the courts.
It would also be hard to prove “crazy” beyond reasonable doubt. I fear a lot of innocent people would end up in jail because they look like the crazy ones.
The covert stuff is almost impossible to see. Everyone else sees her helping you carry a sofa, only you see (if you’re lucky) that she’s guided you under an anvil to drop on you.
Dr. Tara I have an issue with your comment there saying that you do not have a problem with jail time. Now while I do agree anyone who commits acts of abuse (female or male) should have some jail time I think our jails are already overcrowded with people who have mental health issues. I think the main task at hand really should be that the courts actually realize that these women (and men I do not discriminate) who show signs of BPD or any of the personality disorders or any type of mental health issue should be mandated to attend evaluations and possibly even be commited for a through evaluation to be done. and you can control “crazy” I do on a daily basis (I was disagnosed bi-polar 9 years ago) and my husband does as well (he is a disabled veteran with numerous diagnosis)its called therapy and medication. While I understand these women refuse to go to therapy and refuse to even consider that they have a problem this is were the courts need to wake up and take action. This is really the only way to actually ever solve the problem and these men (and women) can have peace of mind and mabye other families can be saved from the hell, heartache and pain I have read about.
I have been married for 15 years and we have had times were I see those women reflected in my behavior (before diagnosis). I have been a lurker on this site for awhile and never thought to comment before until I saw what you said. I am a psychology major and have used this site for resources for friends of mine and advice actually given to a friend who is dealing with a high-conflict ex-husband. Please keep up with the good advice though you do help tons of people.
Hi Nikkie,
Thanks for the comment. I disagree, however. If an individual is breaking the law, they should go to jail, regardless of what their mental health issues are. Counseling is not a consequence. If counseling were a deterrent to abusive and criminal high-conflict behaviors — e.g., making false allegations, breaking court orders — then we’d see a decrease in these behaviors.
The reality is that many individuals with these issues will never change and I for one am sick of seeing them perpetrate their abuses and crimes upon others over and over again. Perhaps you think that having these disorders is punishment enough and I agree — to a point. When these individuals impinge upon the rights of others that is when we need to show more concern for the targets of the disordered than the disordered.
Best,
Dr Tara
His relationship with the children is fragile, but that may have to be as good as it gets.
That is the downside to getting out and leaving young children behind. He has paid a horrible price at the hands of the monster. The kids have also paid a terrible price. I wonder how this will affect their ability to have normal, healthy relationships in the future.
I’m glad that your husband has been able to manage the situation and minimize the damage. It’s a shame it took five years, but at least you’re in a good place now. Thanks for the article.
His relationship with his children would have been fragile whether he stayed or left. My parents are still married. My diagnosed Borderline mother committed continuous acts of parental alienation right under my father’s nose.
By staying in the relationship and having his children witness the abuse, AND HAVING HIS CHILDREN WITNESSING HIM TAKING THE ABUSE, he is doing far worse to model horrible adult relationships for them. Leaving his children behind is the only hope his children will ever have, to see a normal, healthy adult relationship.
So true. That was the first thing I learned from Dr. Palmatier’s posts and I am very, very grateful.
Hear! Hear!
Ditto on my childhood–I see her for what she is b/c I’ve seen what she has done to me behind closed doors / without witnesses.
Staying does NOT help the children. She is playing you for a chump re: her treatment of the children in ‘public’ (with witnesses) just like she plays your friends and family for chumps regarding her treatment of YOU (men).
When you are not around, you have no idea the hell she is putting those chidren through….Take it from the Black Sheep.
You are more than welcome!
My husband didn’t have a choice to get out and leave: He was thrown out and his ex moved the kids out of state. Once they were gone, he moved to another state as well, and then was later accused of abandoning them!
He, like a lot men, was between a rock and a hard place. I have known people who have spent thousands upon thousands of dollars legally fighting these women, only to grow poorer and have the same result.
My husband jumped through so many hoops to have good relationships with his children. I think he’s a great dad.
The rule was he was not to move on and remarry. Impossible situation.
But at least they are talking to him now (they don’t talk to me — I’m evil).
This is all a waste of time. Men do much more harm to men, than any woman possibly could, by simply being the enablers and excusers of female dysfunctional attitude. If this wasn’t the case, society would much more fair and less biased towards one gender.
I no longer address women who perpetuate this nonsense, but the men who back them up. You don’t cure an organism from the symptoms of a disease, but instead cure the organism from the disease itself.
I appreciate what you are doing to help men, Dr. Tara. But for every woman like you that understands where men are coming from, there are 10 men and 20 women who shame and blame the crap out of men, and buy into this Victim Culture. Men need to learn to go their own way. It’s that simple.
Nevertheless, Richard G, I will continue to persevere and try to raise awareness. The do nothing option doesn’t work for me.
Of course, and I appreciate what you are doing. You are a heroine for males everywhere who need a voice. But I feel that the odds are greatly stacked against men. Some people either just don’t care, or they don’t want to listen. And this is what bothers me.
Small triumphs are being made in the court systems every day. PAS is recognized in some states. Arizona automatically defaults to shared custody. It’s still unusual, but more and more fathers are getting primary custody. If not for trailblazers like Dr. T, none of the necessary changes would take place. Edmund Burke said “all that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.”
Rome wasn’t built in a day.
I agree with your take, MB.
Yes, the odds are stacked, Richard, and I think I understand why you hold this perspective. However, I also see small subtle shifts in our culture and this makes me hopeful.
Btw, I’m not a heroine. I have feet of clay just like everyone else. I make mistakes and screw up on a weekly basis and do my best to take responsibility and self-correct.
“by simply being the enablers and excusers of female dysfunctional attitude.”
You do realize that, by blaming men for all this instead of holding these women accountable for their own actions, you are one of those men enabling and excusing female dysfunctional attitudes?
I never said that I don’t hold women accountable for their actions. But as long as their are men that enable and excuse the heinous actions of women, men who are innocent will never get justice, and they will always be in the dark. Why do you think that men who are abused by women are afraid to speak out? Because they need to “man up”, and as far as much of society is concerned, violence of any sort is a woman’s issue.
Feminism is not the greatest threat to men. It’s chivalry. Without chivalry, feminism cannot persist. The men in power only care about one thing, and that is dividing all of us, and creating as much discord as possible. Feminists are simply in league with them, and they are using each other to get what they want, and that is power and wealth. But I am not going to get into that now.
And learn to read between the lines. You just contradicted your own response to me, by telling me that I enable and excuse immoral behavior from women. That is the last thing I do. I hold women to accountability like grown adults, and the problem is that most people won’t. A large number of them being men, who can’t come to terms that women aren’t made of “sugar and spice”. Know your enemy. It’s the system.
“Without chivalry, feminism cannot persist.” I really like this.
Transversely, I’ve always believed that the only proponents for chauvanism are women.
Introspection is always a good thing.
Exactly. I am not here to blame men for Feminism, or to absolve women of their actions. But we need to put things into perspective. The whole Feminist movement is a joke and a failure, and what’s laughable is how they claim that Feminism will help to free men from the their rigid Gender Roles.
The only thing it succeeds in doing is giving women a myriad of options and privilidges, and absolves them of much personal responsibility, as long as they comply with the ideology, and it marginalizes and generalizes males to their very detriments, further criminalizing them. Feminism is treasonous to human rights, especially men’s rights. But we all know this, and I am going to leave it at that. I don’t want to go off-topic any further.
Richard,
I think this is a great conversation. It’s important to express our differences of opinions without attacking each other, which is what’s happening here.
The comment that leads me to believe what I said, is the following:
“I no longer address women who perpetuate this nonsense, but the men who back them up. You don’t cure an organism from the symptoms of a disease, but instead cure the organism from the disease itself.”
You define men’s supporting women as the disease, and women behaving badly as just a symptom. Let me ask you a question, if a woman falsely accuses a man of rape, and some of her man friends went out and pummeled the falsely accused, would you say the men who went out and beat up the man were the problem, and the woman falsely accusing the guy was just a symptom of those men? Would you define the woman as the problem and the men as a symptom? Or, would you simply hold both parties accountable for their respective roles?
My point is, by saying that men pandering to women (which will happen regardless of the woman’s behavior) is the problem, and the women behaving badly is just a symptom (which you don’t feel the need to address), you are laying the blame squarely on men, instead of on those who deserve it. You are granting the women who are behaving badly an excuse to avoid accountability (IE, it’s the men who enabled and excused me, I wouldn’t have done it if they didn’t encourage me”), which is precisely what you claim to oppose. You should be holding whoever is behaving poorly accountable for their own actions (the women who are acting out for acting out, and the men who are excusing them for being stupid), instead of just the men.
” You just contradicted your own response to me, by telling me that I enable and excuse immoral behavior from women. That is the last thing I do.”
That’s not contradicting myself. Contradicting myself would be making a claim that is directly opposite to another claim I’ve made. What you would do (IE, a claim you made) doesn’t count.
This is the last post on the subject for me, as it isn’t on topic. You can respond or not as you so choose. I’ve had my say.
I can’t believe that I am coming back to this topic.
First of all, I am not putting all of the blame on men. My issue, MY MAIN BEEF, is that there are men who continue to excuse the actions of women. Something I am not doing myself. This is why I don’t respect the Men’s Rights Movement. I have a huge distaste for MRAs. Because while we are busy barking at the dogs on the other side of the fence, we have snakes slithering in our own grass, and biting us in our behinds, administering their venom.
You all fail to grasp what is really going. Women will never fully pay for their crimes, as long as we have male feminists like Joe Biden, passing laws such as VAWA, and various judges and juries in our court system who excuse women for their heinous actions, by giving them more lenient prison sentences. This is the point that I am trying to make here. You are painting me as a White Knight when I hate chivalry in all of it’s forms. In order to attack Feminism, and hold women accountable for their actions, you need to take down the very barrier that is in place. This barrier being men WHO HATE OTHER MEN!
And the men encouraging and enabling a woman’s heinous actions, are the very same men who co-sign a woman’s actions. I am not saying these men are brainwashing or influencing women to do anything. But they merely co-sign it, and continue to spread the venom.
I am done with this topic, and I feel that I am deviating from the topic. I am tired of addressing women, when they are being shielded by Feminists and White Knights. Words alone will not bring the justice and equality that we need.
I think you have a point. We need to discuss our problems, but we also need to be aware how this nonsense made it into our lives. Here is a list of feminists. Not sure if it’s complete, but there’s big money and a lot of power in subverting nations.
Bella Abzug
Kathy Acker
Rachel Adler
Larisa Alexandrovna
Gloria Allred
Rebecca Alpert
Pauline Bebe
Hanne Blank
Lisa Bloom
Judy Blume
Daniel Boyarin
David Brooks (journalist)
Susan Brownmiller
Judith Butler
Aviva Cantor
Judy Chicago
Hedwig Dohm
Andrea Dworkin
Ryan Eby
Eve Ensler
Amy Eilberg
Sandy Eisenberg Sasso
Susan Estrich
Susan Faludi
Shulamith Firestone
Betty Friedan
Sarah Michelle Gellar
Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Ilana Gliechbloom
Emma Goldman
Elyse Goldstein
Lynn Gottlieb
Blu Greenberg
Tina Grimberg
Charlotte Haldane
Nina Hartley
Tova Hartman
Judith Hauptman
Dorothy Ray Healey
Brenda Howard
Sara Hurwitz
Paula Hyman
Elfriede Jelinek
Erica Jong
Roberta Kalechofsky
Michael Kimmel
Lydia Rabinowitsch-Kempner
Naomi Klein
Edith Konecky
Barbara Kruger
Anna Kuliscioff
Michele Landsberg
Lori Hope Lefkovitz
Gerda Lerner
Ariel Levy
Fanny Lewald
Rosa Luxemburg
Frederica Sagor Maas
Hana Meisel
Annie Nathan Meyer
Jennifer Miller
Haviva Ner-David
Martha Nussbaum
Tillie Olsen
Judith Plaskow
Rachel Pollack
Katha Pollitt
Sally Priesand
Trude Weiss-Rosmarin
Tamar Ross
Muriel Rukeyser
Zalman Schachter-Shalomi
Rosika Schwimmer
Mendel Shapiro
Christina Hoff Sommers
Sandy Eisenberg Sasso
Susan Sontag
Daniel Sperber
Gertrude Stein
Gloria Steinem
Sandra Steingraber
Cathy Young
Yona Wallach
Wendy Wasserstein
Trude Weiss-Rosmarin
Naomi Weisstein
Ruth Westheimer
Naomi Wolf
Joel B. Wolowelsky
Elizabeth Wurtzel
Cathy Young
I’m not exactly sure what your point is, however you seem to be speaking generally, not specifically. In my ex-wife’s case, while there was one religious leader who unknowingly became an enabler, my ex was enabled by women, most divorced and several who wanted to be. Unfortunately, there were a small number who were conned by by ex-wife, though could have avoided that by simply being a little skeptical (at which point my ex goes into a verbal/emotional rage mode.)
You also misunderstand the dynamic at play within the marriage. In my specific case, my wife did not physically rage. Her emotional abuse was extremely subtle and, as Dr. T said, got me to the point where I questioned my own sanity. Even after our divorce, I questioned whether my version of reality was accurate. Fortunately, my marriage counselor, a sister and my oldest daughter knew enough details to reassure me that my observations were accurate. Since then, a son whom I thought my ex had thoroughly alienated confirmed, without me saying anything, many of the same observations I’d made.
I was fortunate. My ex is very low key and once the divorce happened, except for occasional bizarre comments to family and her friends, I’ve become just another page in her scrapbook. There are many men here who have to deal with women who are doing everything in their power, including using the courts, to destroy them.
What I’m saying is that you seem to be arguing in the abstract, while Dr. T is dealing with the concrete. Yes, feminism has created several generations of women who feel entitled to everything and a court system that hasn’t adjusted to new realities. While that can hopefully be repaired, in the meantime there are many men who are suffering and need help.
When the light bulb first started flickering on for me, I stumbled across another site that explained covert abuse. I thought for sure that’s what I was dealing with.
However, it turns out my wife is rather overt in her abuse – I just didn’t realize I was being abused because I didn’t have any black eyes or broken dishes. I really thought I was a jerk who didn’t deserve my lovely, lovely wife. Now I realize that the constant criticism and put downs are as obvious as a kid’s rhyming taunts.
On the other hand, some of the stuff my mom did was definitely on the covert side. Things like telling me, in a sympathetic tone, not to try painting because I didn’t have good small motor skills. WTF?? Or talking me out of performing at a school assembly because I wasn’t well-rehearsed enough and she didn’t want me to be embarassed (luckily for me, the school principal refused to let me out of performing. Did great and have a great memory!).
I think the covert stuff is far more insidious, and more likely to cause long-term damage, than a big-mouthed bully. It takes time to discover and understand covert abuse, and it’s just about impossible to explain it to anyone who hasn’t lived through it.
My wife is very smart & gifted verbally. Unfortunately she often uses her prodigious abilities for control games and put-downs that are so subtle that, if I tried to explain them, most people would think I was being petty. Her rants/rages (in private) can amount to a continuous barrage of insults, game playing, and manipulative language–trying to persuade me that I am fundamentally at fault for not saying it right, not enough attention, or being inconsiderate of her needs. Naturally, none of her friends see this side of her.
I too have learned to set boundaries. I will call her on her bad language. If that doesn’t work I will tell her that I am not going to listen anymore, and I will physically leave for awhile–often emotionally injured by the nastiness of the insults and unsettled by the manipulative language. She will respond with “Now you are withdrawing. You never talk with me when there’s a problem.” (she can twist anything against me) Then she will complain to our marriage counselor “He won’t talk.” Just this week, the marriage counselor sternly challenged me, brushing aside my complaints of physical and verbal abuse, “What are YOU going to do to improve the relationship?” I try to explain that what she calls “talking” is abuse, but he does not see it. Again, it doesn’t help that my wife communicates well and doesn’t show her dark side in the counseling office. The counselor thinks I am being stubborn and stereotypically reticent and defensive. Ugh.
Find a new counselor, post-haste.
Echo this sentiment. Your therapist sucks.
Psychology has been hijacked by feminism. I have encountered very few people within the mental health field that resemble Dr. Tara.
There are actually more people who feel the same way as Dr. Tara and psychology has not been hijacked by feminism (I actually take offense to that comment). My class (I am a psychology major) has quite a few young men in it and more are coming into the field every year. I don’t see how you could say that, yes I do agree that services for men in abusive relationships is sorely lacking and society as a whole still cannot even concieve the notion that women do abuse men but to blanket statement like that is wrong you are generalizing a whole field that is split into tons of categories of research and practice (Clinical Psychology and Licensed Mental Health Therapists are just 2 fields).
If you elaborate more on why you feel this way and why you make that blanket statement mabye I can understand your point of view but for now I cannot because as of yet in my course of studies I have yet to see anything remotely regarding feminist theory or theories in psychology.
Actually, Nikkie, the field of psychology has been feminized. As a whole, the field portrays women as victims and men as perpetrators. I have worked with countless men who have been further victimized by therapists, social workers, mental health clinicians and psychologists — of both sexes.
I’ve been contacted by young men who are studying psychology that report how they have been silenced and ostracized in their academic programs for speaking out against the predominant women as victims/men as perpetrators model. Furthermore, some of the worst male bashing I’ve witnessed occurred in psych academia.
Just because this hasn’t been your experience, doesn’t mean it isn’t true for many other people.
Well Nikkie, you weren’t present when my ex-wife and I saw the marriage councilor. My personal experience is that your field has been warped and feminized to an insane degree. I had to sit an listen to this “therapist” who had been endorsed by that hack Dr. Fil. beat me down in every way possible. Every fifteen minutes she would remind us of her affiliation with stardom. What a complete waste of time this woman was. She did nothing, zero, and blamed me for everything. So, in short. If you’re going to be in this field at least be fair to men. I’m sick of it already.
Dr. T is indeed a rare gem in this field.
Thanks, SineNomine. I’m not a gem. Just a person who sticks her neck out and sometimes puts her foot in her mouth.
My ex is the same type of nasty. A couple of comments:
1. Trouble explaining it? I describe it this way, and then people understand: it’s not each indvidual controlling, devaluing comment that’s necessarily horrible…though they’re hurtful…it’s the steady stream of them, day in, day out, that does the damage. A steady small drip of water can wear a hole in granite given enough time.
2. None of her friends see it: They will. Once I split from my wife she lost her primary target of control and abuse-as-anxiety-relief. Who do you think she turned it on next? Her friends and family. That’s when they see it.
JP
“death by a thousand pinpricks” Think about that…try to imagine poking pins into a regular sheet of paper….1,000 times. What do you suppose that paper would look like a 1,001?
Describes AXH perfectly…no wonder they can convinces us that we’re the crazy ones.